I, for one, even prefer many Affinity workflows to Adobe's. Most minor bugs can be worked around by trying a different workflow. I've tried several times between 20, and I usually ended up rebuilding the whole thing in ID or in AI respectively because I couldn't get any accurate PDF/X-3 output from Affinity.īy the end of 2020 when v1.8.x appeared to have somewhat matured, it got better, so I decided to convert my projects from CS5 to Affinity, but still pulling my long but increasingly scarce hair while at it.Īs long as the design stays within the Affinity window, all looks fine and well. In the end, it's a question of how much the end result counts vs. □) So even if feature equivalents do exist, people may not necessarily be happy with the solutions the program offers. there's no such thing as Smart Objects in Affinity Photo. (Now wait until they figure out that e.g. I've actually seen someone complain about the foreground and background color swatches of Affinity Photo being arranged differently than in Photoshop. ![]() ![]() On the other hand, some users really seem to expect that the entire UX needs to be perfectly identical to the software they come from. There are users (and I think and hope these might be in the majority) who can adapt to different implementations quite easily and can find and accept workarounds for missing features. And there's more to it: What I've learned from following these forums is that people are not equally flexible in transferring their knowledge and experience to a new piece of software. Everyone has their own ideas of what is "essential"!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |